Chapter 4
How did such confusion and misunderstanding of these satanic Jews, commonly embraced by, yet utterly catastrophic to the rest of humanity, come about?
Immanuel Velikovsky in his epic work Ages in Chaos: From Exodus to Akhnaton presents record of the Israelites battling the Amalekites on at least two occasions as they fled Egypt, doubtless replete with rape of and co-mingling with the Israelites. Roman historian Josephus Flavius however, states the Hyksos (Amalekites) were Jews. Whatever the facts may be, by the time of Christ the Israelites clearly had embraced satanic teachings later to be distilled into written form by Rabbis Aschi, Maremar and Abina as the Babylonian Talmud.
The Amalekites prove to be forebears of the Khazars and descendants of the Edomites. - Josephus Flavius: Against Apion , Book 1, section 73. Gerald Soman, in the Manifesto of the World Jewish Federation, January 1, 1935 writes, “No one can deny that the Jews are a most unique and unusual people. That uniqueness exists because of their Edomite heritage. You cannot be English Jews. We are a race, and only as a race can we perpetuate. Our mentality is of Edomitish character, and differs from that of an Englishman. Enough subterfuges! Let us assert openly that we are International Jews.”
Hasdai ibn Shaprut, foreign minister to Abd-al-Rahman, Sultan of Cordova, in a letter to King Joseph of the Chazars (about 960 AD) speaks of ... the Chazars [who] once dwelt near the Seir Mountains.
“Thus dwelt Esau in mount Seir. Genesis 36:8. The Seir mountain range south of the Dead Sea was known as thèland of Edom` Genesis 36:21, home to the Edomites for nearly a millennium. They arrived in the region at the end of the 14th and the beginning of the 13th century BC” - Encyclopedia Judaica, Vol. 6, pg. 372. In the 6th century BC, “after the fall of Jerusalem in 586 BC, the Edomites began to press northward” [into what became Khazaria]. - The New Westminster Dictionary of the Bible, Henry S. Gehman, 1970, pg. 418.
“Edom is another name for Esau, brother of the biblical patriarch Jacob, Father of the twelve tribes of Israel. Esau rejected God, sold his birthright to his brother Jacob, defied God and family intermarrying with Canaanite women and vowed revenge against Jacob and his lineage. Esau/Edom's descendants continue to this day to wage war against the true descendants of Jacob, intent to systematically destroy Western Christian civilization and oppress all races other than Jew.” - www.vaticproject.blogspot.com . “Esau-Edom is modern Jewry” . - Jewish Encyclopaedia, 1925 Edition, Vol. 5, pg. 41.
Interestingly, authors David Duke in Jewish Supremacism and E. Michael Jones in The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit indicate Jews are descended from Jacob, not from Esau, and cite Judaic, Rabbinic and Biblical sources as reference. An old joke regarding Jews perhaps provides apt comment: “How can you tell when a Jew is lying? His lips are moving.” I trust in this brief overview the essentially satanic nature of world Jewry is made crystal clear.
Cicero, a Roman legislator, spoke of the manipulation exercised by Jews a century before the crucifixion of Christ. “Softly! Softly! I want none but the judges to hear me. The Jews have already gotten me into a fine mess, as they have many other gentleman. I have no desire to furnish further grist for their mills.” Marcus Tullius Cicero, a first century BC Roman statesman and writer, quietly expressed this to the presiding judges in his oration as defense counsel at the trial of Flaccus, a Roman official who had interfered with Jewish gold shipments to their international headquarters in Jerusalem.
For a man of Cicero's stature to have to “speak softly” reveals how pervasive was the malevolent influence of organized Jewry on the Roman Empire. Cicero also writes, “The Jews belong to a dark and repulsive force. One knows how numerous this clique is, how they stick together and what power they exercise through their unions. They are a nation of ... deceivers.”
Describing the savage Jewish uprising against the Roman Empire acknowledged as the downward turning point of that great state, Dio Cassius, a second century AD Roman historian, records in Roman History, “The Jews were destroying both Greeks and Romans. They ate the flesh of their victims, made belts for themselves out of their entrails, and daubed themselves with their blood… In all, 220,000 men perished in Cyrene and 240,000 in Cyprus, and for this reason no Jew may set foot in Cyprus today.”
By the time of Christ, these who claimed to be Jews but were not, more accurately the satanists of Edomite lineage led by the Levite scribes and Pharisees, were adequately in subversive control to pressure a Roman official to arrest and crucify Christ.
From The Bible, speaking of the Jews regarding Jesus Christ:
John 11: 53-57 “Then from that day forth they took counsel together for to put him to death. Jesus therefore walked no more openly among the Jews. Then sought they for Jesus ... Now both the chief priests and the Pharisees had given a commandment, that, if any man knew where he were, he should shew it, that they might take him”.
John 70:6,7 “Jesus answered them, Have not I chosen you twelve, and one of you is a devil?” [He spoke of Judas Iscariot the son of Simon, an Edomite, - Hitchcock, author of The Synagogue of Satan]
Mt. 26;14-16 “Then one of the twelve, called Judas Iscariot, went unto the chief priests, And said unto them, What will ye give me, and I will deliver him unto you? And they covenanted with them for thirty pieces of silver ... Then the band and the captain and the officers of the Jews took Jesus, and bound him.”
John 18:28-31 “Then led they Jesus from Caiaphus unto the hall of judgement: Pilate (the Roman procurator in Judea) asked of the Jews, “What accusation bring ye against this man?”
John 18:34-40 “They answered and said unto him, If he were not a malefactor, we would not have delivered him up unto thee.” Following interrogation, Pilate “went out again unto the Jews, and saith unto them, I find in him no fault at all.” Yet the Jews would not relent pressuring Pilate,
John 19:1-22 “Pilate therefore went forth again, and saith unto them, Behold, I bring him forth to you, that ye may find that I find no fault in him. When the chief priests therefore and officers saw him, they cried out saying, Crucify him, crucify him. Pilate saith unto them, Take ye him, and crucify him:for I find no fault in him.”
Pilate, for his conduct, was removed from the position of Procurator and banished by the Roman government to Vienne, in southern France, where he committed suicide.
Mt. 27:3-5 “And Judas, which had betrayed him, when he saw that he (Jesus) was condemned, repented himself, and brought again the thirty pieces of silver to the chief priests and elders (in an effort to reverse his action), Saying, I have sinned in that I have betrayed innocent blood. And they said, What is that to us? And he cast down the pieces of silver in the temple, and departed, and went and hanged himself.”
What of the remaining eleven disciples who had spent over three years in close relationship with Jesus? John was banished to the Isle of Patmos where he wrote the Book of Revelation. It is recorded he was thrown into boiling oil, but survived and returned to Ephesus, Turkey, where he either died an old man, or was murdered. The records are unclear. All the rest were pursued and murdered under the direction of powerful Jewish leaders in Jerusalem who deemed the disciples guilty “by association”.
Historical records reveal Bartholomew was skinned alive and beheaded; James, the Lesser was stoned and clubbed-to-death; Andrew was crucified upside down on an X-shaped cross; Simon Peter was crucified upside down under Nero's direction; Thomas was impaled on a spear; James, the Great was beheaded; Phillip was crucified; Matthew was burned-to-death; Jude Thaddeus was sawed or axed to death; Simon the Zealot was sawed or axed-to-death.
http://scannedthoughts.wordpress.com/2010/03/29/the-12-apostles-skinned-stoned-crucified-and-beheaded/ and http://www.ichthus.info/Disciples/intro.html .
Who then was the famed Apostle Paul, who became a primary source for what has become “Christianity”? From Christianity's Great Mistake, Lloyd Meeker, Emissaries of Divine Light, pgs. 5-17 “... Jesus Christ Himself trained and instructed twelve disciples, through more than three years of ministry. These disciples were the men whom He ordained to carry on the work which He had begun,... Nevertheless, as we ... consider Christianity as it is at this time widely known, believed and practised, not one of these eleven men whom Jesus Christ Himself instructed is conceived to have been the instrument through whom the practical application of the teaching of Jesus Christ in the world was made manifest. ... Practically all of the doctrines of Christianity, practically all the ideas concerning the organization and function of the church, practically all the precepts to be found in the creeds and doctrines of all Christian churches come, not from Jesus Himself, and not from any one of the eleven disciples whom He taught and trained, but from the Apostle Paul. ... it is NOT sensible to believe that, when Jesus Christ Himself was on earth and took three years to train and instruct eleven men in relationship to his own ministry, one man, who experienced 'spectacular' conversion at a later time should be permitted to completely overshadow the expression of Christianity as revealed by Jesus and his eleven disciples, and that what they had to say should become virtually overlooked. ... Christians have been inclined to see Jesus and the apostles He trained through Paul and his writings, instead of seeing Paul and his writings through Jesus and that which His personally trained representatives did, said and wrote. ... It is not until we see Paul in the right proportionate relationship to the whole picture that we can begin to understand Christianity as it actually is. ... If it is conceived, as many church leaders and Biblical scholars have stated, that the real revelation of Christianity was made through Paul, we should not call ourselves Christians but, rather, 'Paulists'.”
From the Scofield Bible: “It was inevitable that a trained intellect like that of Paul, a convinced believer in Mosaism and, until his conversion on the Damascus road, an eager opposer of Christianity, must seek the underlying principles of the Gospel. ... Immediately after his conversion he preached Jesus as the Messiah; but the relation of the Gospel to the Law [as taught by the scribes and Pharisees] and in a lesser degree to the great Jewish promises, needed clear adjustment [!] if Christianity was to be a reasonable faith, and not a mere dogma. ... Paul went to Arabia [Saudis are Jewish --- 'We, the Saudi family are cousins of the Jews. Our country [Arabia] is the fountain head from where the first Jew sprang, and his descendants spread out all over the world' - King Faisal, interview in Washington
Post, Sept. 17, 1969, https://therearenosunglasses.wordpress.com/2014/02/27 ] to seek and to find the adjustment of questions that were present ... [thus] ... Through Paul alone we know that the church is not an organization, but an organism, the 'body of Christ' , instinct with His life, and heavenly in calling, promise and destiny. Through him alone we know the nature, purpose and form of organization of local churches, and the right conduct of such gatherings. Through him alone we do know that 'we shall not all sleep', that 'the dead in Christ shall rise first', and that living saints shall be 'changed' and caught up to meet the Lord in the air at His return.”
All this speaks of deliberate destruction/obfuscation of the real teachings of Jesus, by those who continue today with their ceaseless “revisionism”, destroying and obscuring truth and those who present it, intent to impose their satanic New World Order on mankind. Jews throughout history and as continues today, feign “conversion” in endless categories - religious, national, medical, corporate - claiming, in every facet of their living presented to the goyim, to be something they are not, while they each in fact provide full personal support to the long contrived ultimate goal of complete satanic Jewish control of all the earth.
At the Council of Nicaea early in the fourth century AD, Emperor Constantine united all religious factions in the Roman Empire under one composite deity, and ordered the compilation of new and old writings into a uniform collection that became the New Testament.
In an account of the proceedings of the conclave of presbyters gathered at Nicaea, Sabinius, Bishop of Hereclea, who was in attendance, said, “ Excepting Constantine himself and Eusibius Pamphilius, they were a set of illiterate, simple creatures who understood nothing.” Secrets of the Christian Fathers, Bishop J.W.Sergerus, 1685, reprinted 1897.
The above framed quotation, and those which follow, courtesy of Tony Bushby, is extracted from Nexus Magazine, Volume 14, Number 4 (June - July 2007). I find much of Mr. Bushby's work to be of questionable source and of questionable intent; another researcher finds Bushby's material, “to be agenda driven.” His framed inclusions presented here nonetheless appear adequately accurate to convey how bastardized the Bible, particularly the current New Testament, has become.
It was subsequently decreed by the Roman Catholic Church that the Old Testament should be united with this “adjusted” New Testament, the contents of both books to be given equal weight as “the word of God.” Thus the horrors of murder, of genocide, of endless bloody slaughter as expressed in Old Testament books such as Deuteronomy were sanctified by a duplicitous church leadership and placed in confusing equal position at the deceptively crafted core of what has become “Christianity”. This laid the foundation for, and made it relatively easy to further brainwash gullible Christians of current time to support Zionism believing impending, satanically crafted Armageddon serves to fulfill prophecy, in preparation for the supposed “second coming” of Christ. Here we see satanic skullduggery at its finest, gobbled up by innocent, somnolent, thoroughly misled human beings eager to pin hope on a superhero, all the while adamantly refusing to wake up, grow up and accept the mantle of personal responsibility as revealed by Jesus Christ.
One glaring example is subtly revealed in the Encyclopaedia Biblica , Adam &Charles Black, London, 1899, vol. iii, p. 3344 , where the Church divulges its knowledge about 'exclusions' in old Bibles, saying: "The remark has long ago and often been made that, like Paul, even the earliest Gospels knew nothing of the miraculous birth of our Saviour".
Early editions of the Gospels and the Bible did not refer to Christ's virgin birth because there was no virgin birth! There was however, birth to a “young woman”. From The Book of Grace, page 416,
“There is a vital key to understanding this passage... , 'Now all this was done, that it might be fulfilled which was spoken of the Lord by the prophet...'. The prophecy is contained in Isaiah 7:14, where the interpretation of the word virgin is 'young woman'. Mary was a very young woman, and the prophecy was that she would conceive, bear a child and call his name Immanuel. The endeavour to make [the] text in Matthew conform to the prophecy renders the accuracy of its details suspect, in this case with regard to the vital word virgin.”
It appears those in the Sanhedrin who helped “adjust” Christianity through Paul for popular consumption, at a later date altered the text from “young woman” to read “virgin”, adding further confusion and preposterous mystery to their ongoing deception of humanity. There were not “exclusions” in early Bibles. Rather, misleading additions and altered meanings were slipped into the original text at later dates.
...the Gospel of Mark in the Sinai Bible carries the "first" story of Jesus Christ in history, one completely different to what is in modern Bibles. It starts with Jesus "at about the age of thirty" (Mark 1:9), and doesn't know of Mary, a virgin birth or mass murders of baby boys by Herod. Words describing Jesus Christ as "the son of God" do not appear in the opening narrative as they do in today's editions (Mark 1:1), and the modern-day family tree tracing a "messianic bloodline" back to King David is non-existent in all ancient Bibles, as are the now-called "messianic prophecies" (51 in total).The Sinai Bible carries a conflicting version of events surrounding the "raising of Lazarus", and reveals an extraordinary “omission” that later became the central doctrine of the Christian faith: the resurrection appearances of Jesus Christ and his ascension into Heaven. No supernatural appearance of a resurrected Jesus Christ is recorded in any ancient Gospels of Mark, but a description of over 500 words now appears in modern Bibles (Mark 16:9-20). Despite a multitude of long-drawn-out self-justifications by Church apologists, there is no unanimity of Christian opinion regarding the non-existence of "resurrection" appearances in ancient Gospel accounts of the story.
Not only are those narratives missing in the Sinai Bible, but they are absent in the Alexandrian Bible, the Vatican Bible, the Bezae Bible and an ancient Latin manuscript of Mark, code-named "K" by analysts. They are also lacking in the oldest Armenian version of the New Testament, in sixth-century manuscripts of the Ethiopic version and ninth-century Anglo-Saxon Bibles. However, some 12th-century Gospels have the now-known resurrection verses written within asterisks-marks used by scribes to indicate spurious passages in a literary document.
The resurrection verses in today's Gospels of Mark are universally acknowledged as forgeries and the Church agrees, saying, 'the conclusion of Mark is admittedly not genuine ... almost the entire section is a later compilation.'
As much as it flies in the face of the widely embraced mythology known as Christianity, the composite result of countless lies and obfuscation designed to obscure the truth of the life and teachings of Jesus the Christ, it is clear there was no “resurrection”. It is further apparent Christ did not actually die on the cross. He went unconscious, and as he observed this occurring declared NOT, “My God, My God, why hast thou forsaken me?” , but instead, “Darkness, darkness now covers my face.” - The Divine Design of Man, 1952, Lloyd Meeker/Uranda, Vol. 2, pg. 559. “The master was speaking in the Motherland tongue, the language that was used in the Garden of Eden, not Aramaic, not Hebrew, not Latin. The Master added, in essence, “I am no longer in position to function in this outer world. The rejection is here. The face of my expression on earth, my body by which I have worked on earth and blessed so many, has been so tortured, so treated, that it is no longer able to function.”
This is further supported in an article written by Joan Griffith, god-daughter of famed researcher of antiquity James Churchward: “Churchward and a Maya scholar named Jaurequi (in History of Central America) translate the last words of Jesus, 'Eli, Eli, lama sabac tha ni,' which is not Hebrew or any recognizable language, as actually 'Hele, hele, lamat zabac to ni' ('I faint, I faint, darkness is coming over my face'). And it is Maya-Naga-Maya of East Asia or modern Maya of Central America.
This is too enlightening to be coincidence, for one of the apostles had claimed Jesus’ last words spoke of darkness. It makes better sense than 'My God, why hast thou forsaken me?' which scholars have long doubted an Ascended Master would utter.” - complete article at http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/arqueologia/esp_churchward02.html
“Human beings had the idea that God had forsaken Him. It looked to the human vision like God had forsaken Him. Therefore the words He used would naturally mean to those people who heard Him, or heard about them, that it was His idea that God had forsaken Him. He did not say it. It is blasphemy to say that He did, and that blasphemy is contained in the Bible itself. That is not a reflection against the Bible, but an evidence of the self-activity of man which did its best to distort the pattern to a point to where what our Lord did on earth would have no meaning on earth. He did say, 'Father, forgive them; for they know not what they do'.”- The Divine Design of Man, 1952, Lloyd Meeker/Uranda, Vol. 2, pg. 559 .
“... in the Gospel of Mark, Joseph of Arimathea is described as visiting Pilate and requesting the body of Jesus. Pilate asks if Jesus is dead and is surprised when told that he is indeed, for his demise seems very rapid to Pilate. But since Jesus is dead, Pilate allows Joseph to take the body down. If we look at the original Greek text, we see an important point being made: when Joseph asks Pilate for Jesus's body, the word used for body is soma. In Greek this denotes a living body. When Pilate agrees that Joseph can take the body down from the cross, the word he uses for “body” is ptoma (Mark 15:43-45).
This means a fallen body, a corpse or carcass. In other words, the Greek text of Mark's Gospel is making it clear that while Joseph is asking for the living body of Jesus, Pilate grants him what he believes to be the corpse. Jesus's survival is revealed right there in the actual Gospel account.
If the writer of this Gospel had wished to hide that fact, it would have been very easy for him simply to use one word for both statements-to have both Joseph and Pilate speaking of the ptoma, the corpse.
Could this be because it was too well known a fact for him to get away with any manipulation of it?
This had to wait for the translation of The New Testament from Greek into Latin: in the Latin Bible - the Vulgate-the word corpus is used by both Pilate and Joseph of Arimathea, and this simply means “body” as well as “corpse”. The hiding of the secret of the crucifixion was completed.” - The Jesus Papers, Michael Baigent, Harper San Francisco, 2006, pgs. 130-131.
Jesus was taken down from the cross and nursed back to health by a few close to him. - Divine Design of Man, Lloyd Meeker. The FACTS about Jesus' teachings and life have long been twisted and largely lost. What remains is a convoluted brew of myth, hearsay and deliberately crafted lies, designed by satanists to keep humanity disconnected from Spirit, our very source, and rule the earth as their own.
"We must frankly admit that we have no source of information with respect to the life of Jesus Christ other than ecclesiastic writings assembled during the fourth century." - Codex Sinaiticus, Dr Constantin von Tischendorf, British Library, London
As the carefully crafted satanic noose tightens choking Life nearer to death, humanity has the opportunity to waken to the deceptive confidence game that has become Christianity. More important yet is acknowledging the puppet masters back of this and endless other cons designed to destroy Life on what is meant to be a sacred planet. Will the opportunity be accepted?
Additionally those who have perpetrated this con want humanity to be yet further deceived thinking Christ himself was a hoax, that He never even existed. Satan certainly is clever, yet, I ask, if Christ were a hoax, why were all His disciples hunted down and murdered? Why were their voices silenced while Paul, coached by unseen “adjusters”, was able to carefully tend to the genesis of what has become the widely accepted mythology known as Christianity? Why do satanic Jews today, as throughout the last 2,000 years, continue to mock Him and condemn Him to boil in steaming excrement forever? Purim celebrations posted on Youtube provide endless footage representative of the ongoing Jewish attack on Jesus the Christ. Would such passionate, focused abuse continue for two thousand years, for no reason? Certainly not. Jesus stood up to the satanists of His time, to the scribes and Pharisees, the Levites, the Mosaists, the money changers. He called them liars, thieves, sinners ... and as he proceeded with these brave deeds, he sought to inspire sleeping humanity to join Him, saying, “And greater works than these shall ye do also. ”
More than speaking the Truth, and revealing Love, in her masterful work The Book of Grace, A Cosmic View of the Bible, Eden Valley Press , 2001 , Grace Van Duzen emphasizes that Jesus the Christ allowed a process of transformation to fill and radiantly overflow from his tortured, “resurrected” body, revealing undeniably the seven dimensional, Spiritually founded nature of each essentially sacred human being.
From The Book of Grace:
“Mark 15:34 And at the ninth hour (Jesus) cried with a loud voice, saying, 'Eloi, Eloi, lama sabachthani?' Which is being interpreted, 'My God, My God, why hast thou forsaken me?'- from the 22nd Psalm.
This verse in Mark occupies exactly the place in the record where Jesus is quoted in Luke as saying, 'Father, into thy hands I commend my spirit.' The quotations in each of these books follows the instance of crying 'with a loud voice', the only instances where that is found.
A contributing factor in this confusion arises from the different languages used in the translation of the Bible. Translated from [the Motherland, Lemurian] tongue the meaning comes out, not, 'My God, My God why hast thou forsaken me', but 'Darkness, darkness covers my face.' This relates to his commending his conscious function to the inner realms, 'darkness' covering the face, or outer conscious aspect of Being. If Jesus had thought God had forsaken him he never would have ascended [more accurately set the stage for a process of transmutation described later in this extensive quotation] . He and his Father had always been one in every respect and it was never more obvious than when he was on the cross.
He was in control throughout that time and consciously working with the invisible levels of his Being.
He deliberately transferred the control from his conscious to his subconscious mind when he said, 'Father, into thy hands I commend my spirit.' His outer capacities, which included the mental, were functioning purposefully with the 'ghost' or spiritual substance, at all levels.
The usual interpretation of the word coma indicates a state of helplessness where the individual is without any control. He never lost control, and his conscious word which committed his spirit to the Father was the seven-plane expression of his Being. Later when he folded the graveclothes in the tomb and came forth into the garden, his conscious mind directed the continuing process of transmutation that had occurred on the cross and in the tomb. This was graphically portrayed by his words 'Touch me not' as he finished the work he had come on earth to do.
An awesome correlation is the episode of darkness covering 'the whole land' which coincided with Jesus' loss of conscious function. It is recorded that 'the veil of the temple was rent in the midst.' The cause of separation between the inner and outer planes of man's Being, 'in the midst' was removed.
Jesus had proved that man as he was created could function in this fallen world, and there was victory over death, which was made possible for the body of mankind in its season.
There have been a number of human beings of great stature through the ages who shared movement out of the fallen state and contributed to the possibility of the coming of Jesus into the world. 'Never yet', however, had anyone proved that it was possible, in the world exactly the way it is, for divine man to experience all that man's inhumanity to man could inflict, and carry through in purity of love and truth, the result of which is undeniably life. In his position of supreme focus Jesus bestowed the ultimate blessing of salvation upon his whole body, the true vine, that in the Lord's season all the earth would be inhabited by Man and Woman as created in the original Garden.
The rich substance of love that has been generated through his faithful servants through all the ages allowed the Lord of Love to appear on earth and positively, powerfully live according to the divine design in a world steeped in death-oriented consciousness. ... Every act of love, of selfless service, of refusal to bow down and worship the devil of the human ego, contributes to the building of our Lord's Body.” - ibid, pg 486-489.
Are we ready to accept His invitation now and stand as mature men and women aligned with, as He would speak of it, The Father, with our spiritual source, and take responsibility for revealing and stewarding heaven on earth? Or will we continue to deny our innate authority in Spirit, believe in fairy tales like virgin birth, resurrection and Rapture, and allow ourselves to be ceaselessly, mercilessly abused by satanic psychopaths while waiting to be “saved” by a super-heroic image conjured to serve as mankind's decoy-of-hope, as these who feign to help humanity actually proceed to trap mankind, whom they describe as human cattle, in Hell?
A fundamental precept of Christian dogma is that, “Christ died on the cross to save us from our sins”.
The simple fact is that Christ was crucified because the satanists, at its core those who now speak of themselves as Jews but were not, demanded he be crucified. Neither the Roman authorities nor the local population had the integrity or the will to stand up and face those manipulative criminals and demand otherwise. Sadly, it appears little has been learned in the intervening 2,000 years, as truth and love along with many who reveal these qualities continue to be crucified today, and international Jewry proceeds to force mankind ever closer to their long contrived Armageddon.
Another disgusting claim by international Jewry is that Jesus the Christ was Jewish. He was NOT!
Exposing the Greatest LIE! JESUS WAS NOT A JEW! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OLXo-
5GL1_o . Jesus Was Not A Jew by Chest Rockwell ... Jews are Caananites!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Wpz2eO5HVE . The True Israelites are White Europeans, Jews admit it, Blacks deny and hate it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-CuOiy6w88U .
From Mullins New History of the Jew, pg. 44:
“When Jesus resolved to go out and preach to the Jews, the devil hurried to dissuade Him from His mission. Matthew IV:8-11, "Again, the devil taketh Him up into an exceedingly high mountain, and sheweth Him all the kingdoms of the world, and the glory of them; and saith unto Him, A l l these things will I give thee, if thou wilt fall down and worship me. Then saith Jesus to him, Get thee hence, Satan; for it is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord Thy God, and Him only shalt thou serve. Then the devil leaveth Him, and behold, angels came and ministered unto Him."
Having spurned the devil, Jesus now went into the towns and preached against the Synagogue of Sa-tan, the Pharisees and scribes who comprised the Elders of Zion, and whose lives were devoted to evil.
He said, Matthew XXIII:13, "But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men; for ye neither go in yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering to go i n ." Jesus continued his criticism of Jewish hypocrisy, saying, Matthew X X I I I : 27-28,
"Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men's bones, and of all uncleanness.' Even so ye outwardly appear righteous unto men, but within ye are full of hypocrisy and iniquity."
When the Elders of Zion heard that Jesus was preaching these words to the multitudes, they met and planned to k i l l Him. St. John VII:1, "After these things Jesus walked in Galilee: for He would not walk in Jewry, because the Jews sought to k i l l Him." "The Jews sought to k i l l Him!" How can anyone believe that Christ was a Jew, after reading these words in the Bible.”
Another of the Jewish lies vigorously promoted currently is that Jesus was coloured, at the least of swarthy skin, with wooly hair and dark eyes! Quoting again from Mullins New History of the Jew, pg.43:
“In His physical presence, Jesus Christ was a blonde, blue-eyed native of Galilee, born of Joseph and Mary. The Biblical scholar Williamson states that Jews formed only a minute portion of the Galilean population, and they were seldom seen in the province. Williamson also says that "the region was entirely Hellenistic in sympathy", meaning that the inhabitants of Galilee, the family and friends of Jesus, preferred Greek culture and opposed Jewish barbarism. Jesus spoke Aramaic to the people, with a Galilean accent. All of these facts are well-known to Christian scholars, yet they insist on confusing people with the terrible Jewish lie and blasphemy that "Christ was a Jew". Why do these self-styled "Christians" do this? Such men actually have no belief in anything, but they find that religion is a good business, and that peddling Jewish lies is the most profitable business of all.
They have even invented a new word to describe the entire Western culture. They call it "Judaeo-Christian" civilization, and no scholar can obtain a university post today unless he writes articles which praise the pluralist "Judaeo-Christian" culture. What does "Judaeo-Christian" culture mean? It means two diametrically opposed forces. It is like saying "black-white" culture, or "Asiatic-European™ culture. And most of all, it means "evil-good" culture, with the Judaeo standing for evil and the Christian, coming in second, meaning good. This is the codeword by which the professional Jewish propagandists in our churches and universities identify each other. They seldom if ever, mention the name of Jesus Christ, except in a sneering aside about a "ragged preacher" or "an itinerant revolutionary".
Why do these self-styled Christians hate Jesus Christ so much? Because He knew them and he named them for all time. He said, Matthew V I: 24-25, "No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon."
Rosemary Reuther, one of the nation's outstanding Catholic scholars and a teacher at George Washington University and Howard University, exposed the origins of our church offices in "The Church Against Itself" , Herder and Herder, NY, 1967, page 134:
"The first concept of church office was borrowed, not surprisingly, from the Jewish synagogue. The sanhedrin, the council of elders which ruled every Jewish community, provided the first model for church office. This pattern was established first in Jerusalem, where, by Paul's time, it had succeeded in replacing the original community of Jesus' followers and substituting a presbyterial structure modeled on the Jerusalem sanhedrin."
Thus we find that the church administration, a short time after the Sanhedrin had demanded Christ's crucifixion, kicked out Jesus' followers and adopted the dictatorial administration of His murderers.
This is one of the most amazing discoveries ever revealed about the strange role of the churches in denying Christ and trying to destroy His followers! Read it again and again, until you understand why the churches today embrace every tenet of Communism and reject every principle of Christ.”
To understand more clearly what is understood by every Jew regarding the Christian myth their satanic tribe has imposed upon western society, read the two segments excerpted from Century Magazine by Marcus Eli Ravage added as addenda near the end of this book.
Martin Luther, in the mid sixteenth century, in his booklet In Secret They Curse Us, wrote:
“And as a distinguishing mark they strengthen their faith and bitter hatred against us by saying among themselves: Keep on, see how God is with us and does not forsake His people in exile. We do not work, we enjoy good lazy days; the cursed Goyim must work for us, for we get their money; thereby we are their masters, they, however are our servants. Keep on dear Children of Israel, it will be better still! Our Messiah will come if we thus continue and appropriate to ourselves, by usury, the “Hemdath” (Hebrew: desire, possessions) of the heathen!' ”
Luther was declared a heretic by Pope Leo X and excommunicated from the Roman Catholic Church in 1520. He was placed in exile in 1521, published a Bible in the people's language of Germany and was a respected leader of the Reformation. You'll recall Rabbi Finkelstein spoke of the broadly based awakening to the satanic Jewish plot then underway in Europe, thus Loyola, as part of their Plan B, under Jewish direction founded the Jesuit order in 1541 to help address the “problem”. Some of Loyola's close compatriots became the Pope's theologians at the Council of Trent, (1545-1563) which is described as the embodiment of the Catholic Counter Reformation.
No comments:
Post a Comment